Looks like the Biden impeachment is over

1,246 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by FLBear5630
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A. Insufficient evidence

B. Republicans are inept
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or another break with protocol by Democrats. Don't get butthurt when the GOP reciprocates.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

A. Insufficient evidence

B. Republicans are inept
Your Conservative values are bleeding through again! LOL!!!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.


Socialists that you support are spending $1T every 90 days of new debt.

#winning

While importing tens of thousands daily/weekly to further minimize the black vote in America. Probably down to 8-9% of the population now since Obama akd Biden back doored their way (Obama knows all about that) into office

And yet, they continue to garner our vote. I just have to laugh.

Trading one daddy for another. Sad
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

A. Insufficient evidence

B. Republicans are inept
Your Conservative values are bleeding through again! LOL!!!
Yes. Why is it funny that Congress should govern well, not ineptly?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

A. Insufficient evidence

B. Republicans are inept
Your Conservative values are bleeding through again! LOL!!!
Yes. Why is it funny that Congress should govern well, not ineptly?
You said "Republicans are inept". Not Congress is inept. Your bias is clear. There is nothing wrong with that, - you just need to own it.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine, which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
They make up what they want to believe. If the facts don't support it, change the definitions. If that won't work, create a narrative for context they want. It is both sides, neither the Dems nor the GOP has a monopoly on this.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.


Wait, how much of your time was wasted?
joseywales
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.


Socialists that you support are spending $1T every 90 days of new debt.

#winning

While importing tens of thousands daily/weekly to further minimize the black vote in America. Probably down to 8-9% of the population now since Obama akd Biden back doored their way (Obama knows all about that) into office

And yet, they continue to garner our vote. I just have to laugh.

Trading one daddy for another. Sad
B oth candidates suck..
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
joseywales said:

Fre3dombear said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.


Socialists that you support are spending $1T every 90 days of new debt.

#winning

While importing tens of thousands daily/weekly to further minimize the black vote in America. Probably down to 8-9% of the population now since Obama akd Biden back doored their way (Obama knows all about that) into office

And yet, they continue to garner our vote. I just have to laugh.

Trading one daddy for another. Sad
B oth candidates suck..
Yep. All we can do is measure that suckage for each candidate and how it affected our lives and compare those results.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine, which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
They make up what they want to believe. If the facts don't support it, change the definitions. If that won't work, create a narrative for context they want. It is both sides, neither the Dems nor the GOP has a monopoly on this.
If Biden isn't impeached then dems absolutely have a monopoly on this.

But GOP is never going to impeach a democrat because they're weak and they want to lose.
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
When did that happen?
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
When did that happen?
July 25th, 2019 was the phone call. You can say that the impeachment investigation was unwarranted and Trump did not tie the aid to the investigation, that's fine.

But to say that the impeachment was for just the act of withholding aid is wrong.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
When did that happen?
July 25th, 2019 was the phone call. You can say that the impeachment investigation was unwarranted and Trump did not tie the aid to the investigation, that's fine.

But to say that the impeachment was for just the act of withholding aid is wrong.
So, let us continue in your fantasy world.

What presidential election was transpiring in the mid summer of 2019?

How was Biden, the person that actually threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine, Trump's political opponent? Biden did not emerge as the left's buffoon until well into 2020.
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
Having a condition on weapons to a country is not the issue. Obviously all of the weapon shipments we send are conditional on multiple things (for example, they won't be used against us). Having a condition that benefits the president personally and not for national interests is the problem.

Firstly, there's no foreign power involved so it's not the same. But no, I trust the court system and four different grand juries have determined that they are not frivolous. Now if the Republican party believed they had evidence that Biden somehow operated above the law in creating fraudulent grand juries, faking evidence, or bribing Judges so that Trump gets arrested before the election then I would hope they would begin an impeachment investigation and I would hope Biden does not obstruct the investigation like Trump did.

GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
Having a condition on weapons to a country is not the issue. Obviously all of the weapon shipments we send are conditional on multiple things (for example, they won't be used against us). Having a condition that benefits the president personally and not for national interests is the problem.

Firstly, there's no foreign power involved so it's not the same. But no, I trust the court system and four different grand juries have determined that they are not frivolous. Now if the Republican party believed they had evidence that Biden somehow operated above the law in creating fraudulent grand juries, faking evidence, or bribing Judges so that Trump gets arrested before the election then I would hope they would begin an impeachment investigation and I would hope Biden does not obstruct the investigation like Trump did.


What color is the sky in your world?
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
When did that happen?
July 25th, 2019 was the phone call. You can say that the impeachment investigation was unwarranted and Trump did not tie the aid to the investigation, that's fine.

But to say that the impeachment was for just the act of withholding aid is wrong.
So, let us continue in your fantasy world.

What presidential election was transpiring in the mid summer of 2019?

How was Biden, the person that actually threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine, Trump's political opponent? Biden did not emerge as the left's buffoon until well into 2020.

I'm not arguing the actual merits of the impeachment, just what the impeachment was actually for.
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
Having a condition on weapons to a country is not the issue. Obviously all of the weapon shipments we send are conditional on multiple things (for example, they won't be used against us). Having a condition that benefits the president personally and not for national interests is the problem.

Firstly, there's no foreign power involved so it's not the same. But no, I trust the court system and four different grand juries have determined that they are not frivolous. Now if the Republican party believed they had evidence that Biden somehow operated above the law in creating fraudulent grand juries, faking evidence, or bribing Judges so that Trump gets arrested before the election then I would hope they would begin an impeachment investigation and I would hope Biden does not obstruct the investigation like Trump did.


What color is the sky in your world?
Red, white, and blue baby. I love my country and trust its institutions. I'm sorry that you don't
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.
When did that happen?
July 25th, 2019 was the phone call. You can say that the impeachment investigation was unwarranted and Trump did not tie the aid to the investigation, that's fine.

But to say that the impeachment was for just the act of withholding aid is wrong.
So, let us continue in your fantasy world.

What presidential election was transpiring in the mid summer of 2019?

How was Biden, the person that actually threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine, Trump's political opponent? Biden did not emerge as the left's buffoon until well into 2020.

I'm not arguing the actual merits of the impeachment, just what the impeachment was actually for.
I am just shooting to hell your justification for the impeachment. These are answers to your timeline that doesn't exist but was used by you.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

GrowlTowel said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
Having a condition on weapons to a country is not the issue. Obviously all of the weapon shipments we send are conditional on multiple things (for example, they won't be used against us). Having a condition that benefits the president personally and not for national interests is the problem.

Firstly, there's no foreign power involved so it's not the same. But no, I trust the court system and four different grand juries have determined that they are not frivolous. Now if the Republican party believed they had evidence that Biden somehow operated above the law in creating fraudulent grand juries, faking evidence, or bribing Judges so that Trump gets arrested before the election then I would hope they would begin an impeachment investigation and I would hope Biden does not obstruct the investigation like Trump did.


What color is the sky in your world?
Red, white, and blue baby. I love my country and trust its institutions. I'm sorry that you don't
Then perhaps you should stop making up facts to support your argument.

1. No grand jury determined that the charges were or were not frivolous.
2. The DOJ is involved in each and every one of the cases.
3. The cases were brought during the election year on purpose.
4. Trump never obstructed Congress during the impeachment.
5. It is Biden, not Trump, that is investigating his chief political rival - THE VERY THING YOU LISTED TO JUSTIFIED TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Bestweekeverr said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

J.R. said:

just another example of the R's wasting everyone's time and getting nothing done for the people.
This illustrates the problem very clearly. The sheep simply don't care.

Biden holding shipments of weapons to Israel already approved by Congress is a whole lot more egregious than Trump withholding monetary aid to Ukraine (Before the Russian invasion), which he was impeached for. My guess is you probably don't care about that either.
The president is allowed to withhold aid/weapons. The president is not allowed to withhold aid/weapons in order to solicit another country to influence a presidential election by extorting them to investigate his political opponent, and then obstructing the House from conducting its impeachment investigation.

If you can't see the difference than you are being intentionally obtuse and partisan.



So according to you, perfectly okay for Biden but not okay for Trump. Got it!

I am sure you feel the same way about the classified documents cases.

I will stop being so partisan. LOL! !!!
If Biden did what Trump did then it would not be okay. I'll try to keep this simple for you:

Biden withholds weapons from Israel = Fine
Biden withholds weapons from Israel unless they conduct an investigation on Trump to help Biden win the 2024 election = bad



Biden is withholding weapons from Israel under the condition that they not mount an offensive in Rafah to eliminate the remaining cells of Hamas. Sure sounds quid pro quo to me!

So you don't think what the Democrat Party is doing to Trump regarding all of these frivolous court cases is interfering with the 2024 election? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.
i think the difference was that Trump tied it to investigating Biden.

If Biden tied the weapons to investigating Trump, then it would be the same.

I agree he F-ed up the call. But it was not impeachment level F-up.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.